praying alone if one has missed jama’ah in the masjid? shaykh Albani

Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:09 pm (PDT) . Posted by:

“Luqman Yusuf”

Sent to me by brother Anwar Libyan, in response to my previous email regarding praying a second Jama’ah in the same Masjid:

Ruling for Holding
a Second Jamaa’ah in the Same Masjid

Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee

Question: What is the religious ruling concerning holding a second
congregational prayer in the masjid?

Answer: The scholars of Fiqh have differed with
regard to the ruling on holding the second congregational prayer. However,
before we mention the difference of opinion and clarify which is the most
correct of them, we must first identify the type of congregation that they
differ on. 

The subject of disagreement is with
regard to the congregation that is established in a masjid that has a regular
employed Imaam and mu’adhin. As for the congregations that are established in
any other place, be it in ones home, a masjid built on the road (i.e.
musalla) or a store, then there is nothing that prevents one from having
repeated congregations in those places.

The scholars who hold the opinion that it
is disliked to have numerous congregations in the above type of masjid, the
one that has a regular Imaam and a regular mu’adhin, derive their ruling from
two evidences. The first is textual and comes from the Divine Legislator,
while the other is theoretical and it is a contemplation of the narrations
and the wisdom behind the prescription of the prayer in congregation.

As for the textual evidence, then they have investigated and found that the
Prophet (saws) went throughout his life leading the people in congregational
prayer in his masjid. Nevertheless, whenever any individual from his
Companions entered the masjid and found that the congregational prayer had
finished, he would pray alone and he would not wait (for others to come). Nor
would he turn towards his left or right, as the people do today, looking for
one or more people so that one of them can pray with them as an Imaam.

The Salaf never used to do any of this. So when one of them would enter the
masjid and find that the people had prayed, he would pray by himself. This is
what Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee concluded in his book Al-Umm, and his
discussion on this topic is from the moist comprehensive of talks that I have
seen from the discussions of the Imaams on this issue, such that he said:

“If a group of people enter a masjid and find that the Imaam has already
prayed, then they should pray individually. But if they pray in a congregation,
then their prayer is acceptable and correct, however, I hate that they do
this for it was not from the customs of the Salaf.”
Then he said: “As for the masjid that
is on the highway, which doesn’t have a regular employed Imaam and mu’adhin,
then there is no harm in holding numerous congregational prayers in it.”

Then he said: “And we have memorized that a group from the Prophet’s
Companions missed the congregational prayer, so they prayed individually.
Even though they had the ability to congregate and pray together a second
time, they did not do this because they hated to hold the (same)
congregational prayer in the masjid twice.”

This is the saying of Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee. And what he mentioned that the
Companions used to pray individually when they would miss the congregational
prayer, has been mentioned as a ta’leeq narration in shortened form. And
Al-Haafidh Abu Bakr Ibn Shaybah transferred that to his famous book Al-Musannaf. He
reported it with a strong chain of narration on the authority of Al-Hasan
Al-Basree that when the Companions would miss prayer in congregation, they
would pray individually.

Ibn Al-Qaasim related this understanding in his Mudawwanat-ul- Imaam Maalik
on a group of the Salaf, such as Naafi’ the servant of Ibn ‘Umar, Saalim Ibn
‘Abdillaah and others, that when they would miss the prayer, they would pray
individually and they would not establish the congregation a second time.

Also, Imaam At-Tabaraanee reported in his Mu’jam Al-Kabeer with a good
chain of narration from Ibn Mas’ood that he went out one day with two of his
companions from his house to the masjid in order to pray in the congregation.
But when they got there, they found the people leaving the masjid for they
had finished the prayer. So he returned to his home and led them in prayer.
So this returning of Ibn Mas’ood – being who he was due to his accompaniment
of the Messenger (saws) and his knowledge and understanding of Islaam – if he
knew the prescription of praying numerous congregations in one masjid, he
would have entered with his two companions and prayed in congregation with
them. This is since he knew the saying of the Prophet (saws): “The
best prayer of a man is the one he performs in his house, except for the
obligatory prayer.” So what was it that prevented Ibn Mas’ood (raa)
from praying this obligatory prayer in the masjid? – his knowledge that if he
prayed it in the masjid, he would have to pray it alone. So he held that if
he congregated in his home that would be better than if he and those with him
prayed individually by themselves in the masjid.

So this is a collection of the quotes that support the point of view of the
majority of the scholars that have disliked numerous congregations held in
the described masjid in the manner mentioned previously.

Thereafter, people will not miss finding other evidences, while doing some
deduction and precise investigation. Thus, the two Imaams, Al-Bukhaaree and
Muslim, have reported from the hadeeth of Abu Hurairah (raa) that the Prophet
(saws) said, “I felt a strong desire to command a man to lead the
people in prayer. Then command some men to fetch firewood, then go to the
people who have left off praying in congregation and set their houses on
fire. By the One in whose hand the soul of Muhammad is, if one of them knew
that he would find two good hunted game in the masjid, he would surely come
to witness the two.” In this hadeeth, the Prophet (saws) threatened
those who refrained from attending the congregational prayer in the masjid
with burning them with fire. I believe that this hadeeth alone informs us of
the previously mentioned ruling or it informs us of what Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee
has stated and what Ibn Abee Shaybah has related. And that was that the
Companions would not repeat the prayer in congregation in the masjid. This is
since, if we were to assume that the second and third congregations were
legislated in the masjid, then there came this severe threat from Allaah’s
Messenger (saws) to those who refrained from the congregational prayer, which
congregation is it that they are refraining from? And for which congregation
that they refrained from attending was this severe threat intended?

If it is said: “For the first congregation” , then it must said:
These other congregations are not legislated. And if it is said: “This
severe threat only applies to the one who refrains from every congregation,
however many even if their number is continuous. So then in this case, the
argument of Allaah’s Messenger (saws) against anyone of those people who
refrained from any of the congregations would not be established at all. This
is since if he were to surprise one of them, after having put someone in
charge to lead the prayer, by going to his house and finding him spending
leisure time with his wife and children. And so he (saws) would reprimand him
for this, saying: “Why don’t you go pray in congregation? ” He would
simply reply to him: “I will pray with the second or third
congregation. ” So will the Messenger’s (saws) argument be established
against him? Due to this, the Messenger’s strong desire to authorize someone
to take his place and for him (saws) to surprise those who refrained from
attending the congregational prayer and burn their houses down, is the greatest
proof that there is no second congregation at all. This is with respect to
the textual reports that the scholars have relied on for support.

As for the investigation, then it is from the following angle: There are many
ahaadeeth reported that state the virtue of the prayer in congregation. From
them is the Prophet’s (saws) saying: “Prayer in congregation is
better than praying alone by twenty-five – and in one report – by
twenty-seven degrees.” So this great virtue was only stated for the
prayer in congregation.

And there is stated in other ahaadeeth that: “The prayer of a man
along with another man is more purer in the sight of Allaah, than his praying
alone. And the prayer of a man along with two other men is purer in the sight
of Allaah than his praying with one man.” This is because every time
the congregation increases in its number of individuals, its reward
multiplies with Allaah.

So if we keep this understanding in mind and then look at the consequences of
the opinion that allows the holding of numerous congregations in the masjid
that has a regular Imaam, then it has the worst consequences. This is because
the opinion for holding repetitive congregations will lead to the minimizing
of the amount of people who attend the first congregation. And this
contradicts the incitement that we find in the hadeeth: “The prayer
of one man along with another man is purer that his praying alone”
since this hadeeth encourages that there be many people in the congregation.
And holding the opinion that the congregations can be repeated in the masjid,
by necessity, leads towards a minimization of the amount of people in the
prescribed first congregation and a division of the Muslims’ unity.
And there is something else that requires
careful examination. And it is that we must remember that the hadeeth of Ibn
Mas’ood (raa) in Saheeh Muslim, similar to the hadeeth of Abu Hurairah (raa):
“I strongly desired to command a man and so he would lead the people
in prayer.” It was stated with respect to those who refrained from
performing the Jumu’ah prayer. So when we know that Ibn Mas’ood (raa) placed
a threat, of a specific type, on every person that refrains from attending
the Jumu’ah and the congregational prayer, then we realize that these two
prayers are with regard to their link to the congregation. For indeed, this
threat means that there is to be no second congregation after any of these
two prayers. Thus, the Jumu’ah prayer – until now – is preserved in its
singularity and there is no opinion held stating that it is prescribed to
have numerous (Jumu’ah) prayers in one masjid. All of the scholars, in spite
of their differences agree on this. Due to this, we can see the masjids
crowded with people on the day of Jumu’ah. And if it doesn’t escape out
minds, we must remember that from the causes of the masjids being filled on
the day of Jumu’ah is that there are those who attend Jumu’ah yet do not
attend any of the other (regular) prayers. However, there is no doubt that
the cause for the masjids being filled with people on the day of Jumu’ah is
that the Muslims do not practice – and all praise is for Allaah – the act of
repeating the Jumu’ah prayer (continuously) in the same masjid. So if the
Muslims were to treat the congregational prayer like they treat the Jumu’ah
prayer and like the way the matter was during the time of Allaah’s Messenger
(saws), the masjids would be filled with people. This is since every person
that constantly prays in congregation will always have in his mind that if he
misses the first congregation, he will not be able to attain it after that.
So this belief will serve as an incentive for him to closely guard his
attending of the congregational prayer. And the opposite is true also. If a
Muslim holds inside that if he misses this first congregation, then he can
always find a second one or a third one or sometimes even a tenth one, then
this is from the things that weaken his enthusiasm and aspiration in
attending the first congregation.

There are two things that remain before us:

First we must clarify that those who held the view that the second
congregation, according to the particularization mentioned previously, was
not legislated, and who said that doing it was disliked, they are the
majority of the Imaams of the Salaf. Amongst them are the three Imaams – Abu
Haneefah, Maalik and Ash-Shaafi’ee. Imaam Ahmad is also amongst them
according to one report. However, this report is not well known amongst his
followers today, even though one of his most specialized students, Abu Dawood
As-Sijistaanee mentioned it. Thus, he reported from him in his book Masaa’il
Al-Imaam Ahmad that he (Ahmad) said: “Repeating the congregational
prayer in the two sacred masjids (i.e. of Makkah and Madinah) bears the
highest level of disapproval (kiraaha).” So this, from the aspect
of preference, indicates to us that there also exists the disapproval of
repeating the congregations in other masjids as well. However, it (the level
of disapproval) is more severe in the two (sacred) masjids. So in this
report, Imaam Ahmad is in conformity with the other three Imaams.

Secondly, the other report on Imaam Ahmad – the one which is more known to
his students – he (rahimahullaah) and those interpreters who followed him,
base their support for it on a hadeeth reported by At-Tirmidhee, Imaam Ahmad
and others. It is the hadeeth of Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudree, in which he said: “A
man entered the masjid when the Messenger (saws) had already prayed and his
Companions were gathered around him (saws). This man wanted to pray, so the
Prophet (saws) said: ‘Is there not a man who can give charity to this person
by praying with him?’ So a man stood up and prayed with him.” And in
the report of Abu Bakr Al-Baihaqee, which is found in his Sunan Al-Kubraa, it
is stated that this man was Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq. However, this report has
weakness in its chain. The report that is authentic doesn’t name the man in
it. So these (scholars) have used this hadeeth as evidence and say: “The
Messenger (saws) has approved of the second congregation! “

The response to the use of this evidence is that we must consider that the
congregation, which the hadeeth talks about, is not the same congregation
that is being indicated in the question. This is since the congregation that
the hadeeth refers to the congregation of a man who enters the masjid after
the first congregation has finished and wants to pray alone. But the
Messenger (saws) incited those of his Companions who had prayed with him
already to let one of them get up and volunteer and pray a voluntary prayer.
So someone did it and that is the way it occurred. So this congregation
consists of two people: The one leading the prayer (imaam) and the one being
led (ma’moom). The Imaam is praying his obligatory prayer, while the ma’moom
is praying a voluntary prayer. So who is the one who put this congregation
together? If it were not for the one praying voluntarily, there would be no
congregation. So therefore, this is a supererogatory and voluntary
congregation, and not an obligatory congregation. And the differing
(mentioned in the question) is only with regard to the second obligatory
congregation. So due to this, using the hadeeth of Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudree as
evidence for this area of dispute is not correct. And what further confirms
this is the fact that the hadeeth states: “Is there not a man who can
give charity to this person by praying with him?” In this incident
that occurred, there was someone who gave charity and there was someone who
received charity. So if we were to ask a person with the least amount of
knowledge and understanding: “Who is the one giving the charity and who
is the one receiving the charity in this situation, which the Messenger
(saws) has approved of?” The answer would be: “The one giving the
charity is the person praying the voluntary prayer, who had already prayed
the obligatory prayer behind Allaah’s Messenger (saws), while the one who is
receiving the charity is the person who arrived late.”

Now if we were to throw this same question on the congregation that is in
dispute right now: for example six or seven people enter the masjid, and find
that the Imaam has already prayed. So one of them leads the prayer and the
rest follow him in a second congregation. So who is the one giving the
charity amongst these people? And who is the one receiving the charity? No
one can give the same answer as in the first example. So this congregation
(of people) that has entered after the Imaam finished praying, all of them
are praying their obligatory prayer. There is no one giving charity, nor is
there anyone receiving charity. On the contrary, this obscurity is quite
obvious and clear in the first example. The one giving charity is the person
who is praying the voluntary prayer, who already prayed behind Allaah’s
Messenger (saws). His prayer was recorded as twenty-seven levels (of reward).
So because of that, he is rich and therefore able to give away in charity to
others. And the one who leads the prayer – and if it were not for that person
giving charity, he would have prayed alone – he is poor and in need for someone
to give him charity. This is since he did not earn what the person who is
giving him charity earned (from reward).

So the reason for this person being the one giving the charity and that
person being the one receiving the charity is clear. As for the scenario that
is in dispute now, then the scenario is not clear, for all of the people
(praying) are poor, since they have all missed out on the virtue of the first
congregation. So the saying of Allaah’s Messenger (saws) “Is there
not a man who can give charity to this person by praying with him”
doesn’t apply here. Therefore, in a situation like this, it is not valid to
use this incident (mentioned in the hadeeth) as evidence. Nor can it be used
in reference to this issue, which is the area of our discussion.

We will link this to another evidence they use as proof, which is the
Prophet’s (saws) saying: “Praying in the congregation is more
virtuous than praying alone by twenty-seven degrees.” So they use
the generality (in the hadeeth) as evidence, meaning they understand that the
word “the” before the word congregation is for a general inclusion
(of all congregations) . This means that (according to them) every
congregational prayer is more virtuous than praying alone. We respond by
saying, basing it on the previously mentioned evidences that “the”
is not for a general inclusion, but rather it is for a specific designation.
This means that the congregational prayer – which the Messenger (saws)
prescribed, incited towards, ordered the people to attend, threatened those
who abandoned it with burning their houses and which those who abandoned it
were described as being hypocrites – is the prayer in congregation that is
more virtuous than praying alone. And it is the first congregational prayer.
And Allaah, the Most High, knows best. 

Source: Al-Asaalah
Magazine: Issue 13-14 (Contained in the E-Book: Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee)

Translator: Isma’eel Alarcon


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s